It’s becoming more and more likely that the clients I see on a regular basis will be coming to me with a car loan that’s “upside down” — in other words, a loan that has a payoff figure which exceeds the car’s value.
How this happens:
In each instance, the bottom line is that the owner of the car doesn’t build an equity position in the car’s ownership until relatively late in the game. This, coupled with the quick depreciation rate in almost all consumer vehicles, yields a situation where the owner owes more than the car is worth. If the car sells for $10,000 but the payoff is $14,000, then the owner must come up with the extra $4,000 somewhere else.
Strong equity positions are good things, be they in homes or in cars, and so the upside-down loan, or negative equity position, puts the owner in a weaker circumstance. To avoid this, car buyers can either structure their acquisitions more carefully, explore leasing as an option, or — an option this article doesn’t seem to mention — purchase a less costly used vehicle.
I found your site on google blog search and read a few of your other posts. Keep up the good work. Just added your RSS feed to my feed reader. Look forward to reading more from you.
- Jason.
Nice info. I agree that potential car owners should not always think of the “James Bond” car when wanting to buy a new or used car…it would help them financially to know that just having a car to get anywhere is sometimes just as good as having a high-end luxury vehicle that wastes money.