Someone identified only as “PaulMac” wrote here on this blog, in response to my post about Richard Bitner, the subprime insider who wrote about his experiences in the subprime industry, the following:
I would add another group of people who are profiting greatly from the subprime problems (and economy in general), and will continue to profit for some time - bankruptcy lawyers. Including the ones who write about the subject for the purpose of marketing and getting clients. Books and Blogs; Pot and Kettle.
Fair enough. But since it’s my blog, I get to respond. In full.
Of course, this blog has a place in my marketing efforts. I’m a solo practitioner. I believe very strongly in the power of blogs to do two very important things: (1) reach people and (2) reach people. People as potential clients and people as consumers. Both need the information I provide here as a matter of public education.
And, yes, I need it as a means to reach more folks than I otherwise would be able to do through “traditional” marketing means (which I eschew in full — I do no advertising, and I don’t even have a Yellow Pages ad — or listing). I can certainly understand being skeptical of any blog that smacks of “advertising.” But that’s not the primary purpose of this blog, which is to educate and empower.
However, to understand fully why I do what I do, you have to know a little bit more about me.
I left a job that paid me about $70,000 a year to launch this solo practice. The timing of that launch was dictated in part by my mother’s final illness — I needed to stay home and take care of her, and I needed to have a way to make money that allowed me to work from home. But that doesn’t explain why I chose consumer bankruptcy as my primary practice area.
In point of fact, that choice doesn’t make a lot of sense, in the context of my legal experience up until the point of my solo practice’s launch. I’d spent my legal career up until that point practicing a very different kind of law: municipal and then more specifically airport law. I had bankruptcy experience in terms of monitoring the airport’s claims against bankrupt airlines but no experience representing debtors.
Why did I choose that practice area, then, when it was brand new? I certainly would have had an easier time focusing solely on employment law (another practice area that I did choose and work in initially, in order to help broaden my prospects), in which I did have direct experience.
The answer is simple: I chose bankruptcy — specifically consumer bankruptcy — because once upon a time, I’d been harassed by creditors and burdened by debt myself. I didn’t file bankruptcy (although in retrospect I think I should have), but I did know first hand what it was like to be buried by medical bills and have precious little income, to be torn and anguished, and to be harassed at all hours by ugly, intimidating, insulting collectors who flaunted their violations of federal law with impunity.
So I educated myself — I spent countless hours poring over every book I could find, reading cases, talking with other bankruptcy lawyers, preparing their petitions as “on the job” training, being mentored by them. And when I was ready, I began accepting my own clients.
As far as the “profiting” comment — well, yes, I turn a profit in the sense that I make more than expenses demand, but not by much. My fees are publicly stated on my website: I make $1200 per Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, and I take no more than 4 cases a month, in order to handle the cases personally. I have no interest in creating a volume practice — in some months, the number is 0. I make nothing like Mr. Bitner’s publicized salary, and never will — at least not from this work. High six figures? More like low five figures — sometimes VERY low!
So as for why I do what I do: I do it, not to get rich, but because I believe in it. Because I believe it’s important work, and I’m uniquely situated to do it. If my daughter and I have to eat hot dogs and mac and cheese a few times a month, and forgo a vacation to — well, anywhere — it’s worth it. I will never get rich off of it, and I don’t want to. I get paid in far more profound ways.
I have no problem with your blog, or this latest marketing statement (and I accept what you wrote as sincere, but it is also marketing). Obviously I read it. I also have no problem with someone writing a book, and making money from it, though I have no plans to read this particular book. The issue is that you hypocritically attacked the author of the book, in the same breath as you were doing the exact same thing you accuse him of doing. How much you make, or whether you have a true desire to help people, does not change what you did. You just wrote several paragraphs of reasons why you can do it, but presumably the other person cannot. Perhaps readers will give you the benefit of the doubt you obviously do not give the author (even when given a second chance to review what you did).
I have to disagree that there is any hypocrisy here. My point with the earlier post was that the person who could afford to take a year off to promote a book lambasting the greed of the subprime industry was by his own admission a major player in that industry and at least partially responsible for the fallout.
I’ve played zero part in the subprime industry, thus there’s no hypocrisy there.
I’m as much a capitalist as the next small business owner (obviously), and don’t begrudge anyone making money. The problem was not the fact that he was making money off the book — it was that he’s making money from both sides of the fence.
(Another example: a governor well known for hard-line stances against criminal behavior being brought down by a prostitution scheme … same thing, different degrees.)
You’re welcome to your own opinions, of course, no matter how wrong-headed I think they are. However, since this doesn’t have one whit to do with the mission of this blog — which is to educate consumers on their rights and obligations with respect to bankruptcy and consumer law issues — further comments along this line should be remitted via email and not on this blog. Or, start your own blog.
Sheryl, you’ve got my vote in this debate, if that’s what it is. I practice Consumer Protection and Lemon Law for consumers because I owned a lemon once (and I wish I knew then what I know now). People who haven’t been there, so to speak, do not know what it’s like. People who have been there, try to help others because we understand precisly what it is like to be in that spot and we didn’t like being there ourselves and don’t like seeing others there now either.
Thank you so much Ronald! It’s amazing to me how many of us consumer attorneys got here because of personal and direct experiences, either in our own lives or in the lives of those we love.