Bankruptcy
More on Bailout + Bankruptcy Reform
The National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys* has joined the growing chorus of voices demanding that Congress not give in to rampant bullying pressure to act hastily in passing bailout legislation (something I wrote about on this blog right here). As I did in that post, they’ve suggested some language for others (specifically, bankruptcy attorneys) to use in communicating the need for mortgage reform concurrent with any bailout of finance industry giants to elected representatives:
As a constituent and bankruptcy attorney working to help families in our community save their home from foreclosure, I urge you to include court-supervised mortgage restructuring for financially distressed American homeowners in any package you approve to bail out Wall Street. Why do I support this approach?
- The rapid deterioration of the financial sector has been fueled by the steep rise in delinquencies and foreclosures of risky mortgages.
- These mortgages have been sliced up and sold in complex financial instruments that now sit as “toxic assets” on the balance sheets of our largest banks.
- Every financial expert, including Treasury Secretary Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke, agree that we will not stabilize our financial markets until we stabilize the housing markets.
- The housing market will not stabilize absent a solution to the tide of foreclosures.
- Simply giving a government entity the authority to purchase the “toxic assets? of troubled financial institutions will not result in fewer foreclosures. This is complicated, but the basic problem is that the government will not be buying mortgages …those mortgages have been carved up and sold to investors all over the world. The government essentially would have to put all the pieces back together to modify the loan, which just is unrealistic.
- Court-supervised mortgage modification in Chapter 13 bankruptcy is perhaps the most effective tool for ending the foreclosure crisis.
- Court -supervised mortgage modification will not cost the U.S. taxpayer one penny, but will keep families on Main Street in their homes. It deserves your support as you consider a taxpayer funded bailout of Wall Street.
This is much more nuanced and persuasive than my admittedly off-the-cuff attempt! Feel free to pull and use at will — omitting, of course, the language about being a bankruptcy attorney, unless of course you are one! — as I’m sure NACBA* just wants the message sent, and doesn’t care who sends it!
* Earlier versions of this post mistakenly referred to the group in question as NACA or the National Association for Consumer Advocates. The SC Bankruptcy & Consumer Law Blog regrets the error.
[...] UPDATE: There’s an even better letter you can copy and edit to send to your representatives about this issue in this post. [...]
It’s a quite difficult decision for any politician choosing between more bailout packages or letting the free market economic principles take care of the failed businesses, whether it is the financial institutions or automakers. The main focus should be defending the interests of middle-class Americans and creating a stable economic system that will guarantee long-term stability and sustainability. But here we also can face more challenges, since right now the Washington politicians are talking about the second large bailout package. If we bailout financial institutions and other industries again, when are they going to ask for the third bailout package? Or fourth? Maybe this is a time to let free market economy work rather than keep bailing out large, failed corporations? After all, it is the small and medium size businesses that create vast majority of middle-class jobs in America, not the large corporations. Maybe the government is better off to replace banks in lending practices and directly give loan packages with low interest rates to small and medium size businesses? That might work better and have a direct, immediate impact on economy and the middle-class America…